Sat 30 Aug 2008
The Future (Draft 1)
Posted by puffer under ...and everything , audio geeking , digitallofi creative[6] Comments
I was, this morning, pondering the fates of DAWs and my use of them. On one hand, I have a working setup and no desire to upgrade seriously; I’m not getting paid for this and I just want to make some music already. On the other, there may come a point where I want change my mixing or in/out structure, want to take advantage of some new technology, or I’m just sick of whatever bugs are getting in the way of making said music.
More or less my DAW fate will be dictated by what Cakeland1 decides to with its product line.
If they upgrade Sonar 8 in such a way that it deals with some of the programming deficiencies, without loosing what works, I’ll certainly stick around with it; if they figure out what to do with Project 5, I’ll stick with that.
If they drive Sonar off the cliff, the question becomes what will I use for tracking, editing, and mixing? If they finally admit that they’re not going to anything with Project5, then what?
Live is all the rage and I’m sure and it’s a good VST performance host. But I personally have no conception of recording audio tracks into Live. I mean I know you can do it, but more, will it work for me?
I once again looked at the Reaper screenshots, and, yeah, I just can’t get behind that GUI. I know it’s skinnable and all, but there’s just something about the core aesthetic that I find ungainly. I’m sure if I used it and got used to it it would be fine, and I could strip it down, but why is everything so wide and squat?
So, like a lot of my musings, this is all academic. Cakewalk provides everything I need right now, I’m used to working with it, I’m rededicating myself to taking advantage of shortcuts, templates, fx-chains and using it efficiently. I don’t need/particularly want to drop vast sums money and time into my DAW. The occasional new plugin or soundware. But, I’m really beginning to like the idea of using last year’s tech. There’s just the whole, “if it breaks” thing.
1Cakewalk + Roland= get it? Yeah, it’s dumb.
August 30th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Reaper is actually the only sequencer that works for recording audio on my computer. I have no idea why. Have tried a bunch of different settings with other programs but there are always pops and crackles when I record. Not so with Reaper. Go figure.
August 30th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
As someone who cut their digital teeth on trackers like Buzz, and used Cool Edit Pro for multitracking purposes, I found Live to be remarkably intuitive. The learning curve was much less intensive than any other software package I’ve worked with, and seemed to make more sense. Just sayin’…
August 30th, 2008 at 11:50 pm
@John It seems almost inevitable. But you’re history with sequencing is much deeper than mine. I went from ACID to Sonar. Project5 was that first “Oh, shit, there’s totally other ways of doing this with even better results” product for me. And if I like P5 I have a hard time imagining that I wouldn’t grok to Live. Really, I should buy the cut-down version just so I’m semi up-to-speed on what the hell I’m talking about.
@Alexander: I hate to say it, but GUI means a lot to me. I think the most fascinating development is the Mac version. Maybe some of that famous Apple branding mojo will be reflected back at it. (I never thought of WinAmp as a particularly good looking program.) Or maybe someone can show me a skin that doesn’t look so dense. Don’t get me wrong, I think the development of Reaper is a hugely positive step for electronic music and for stepping up the game. I’m no hater.
August 31st, 2008 at 12:17 pm
I totally agree that the Reaper interface is somewhat ugly and clumsy. I have yet to see a skin that is both inspiringly beautiful and practical at the same time. Still, in many ways, I think it’s a wonderful little program, and despite its shortcomings a very strong competitor to the giants in the field.
September 4th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Can you be more specific about what you’d want from the next SONAR? Which deficiencies, specifically?
September 4th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Peter, that’s a good question. I’ll write up a post tonight to see if I can talk in something other than vague allusions.